home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- The Effects of Television Violence on Children
- Children and Televison Violence
-
- What has the world come to these days? It often seems like
- everywhere one looks, violence rears its ugly head. We see it in the
- streets, back alleys, school, and even at home. The last of these is a
- major source of violence. In many peoples╒ living rooms there sits an
- outlet for violence that often goes unnoticed. It is the television,
- and the children who view it are often pulled into its realistic world
- of violence scenes with sometimes devastating results.
- Much research has gone into showing why children are so
- mesmerized by this big glowing box and the action that takes place
- within it. Research shows that it is definitely a major source of
- violent behavior in children. The research proves time and time again
- that aggression and television viewing do go hand in hand.
- The truth about television violence and children has been shown.
- Some are trying to fight this problem. Others are ignoring it and
- hoping it will go away. Still others don╒t even seem to care. However,
- the facts are undeniable. The studies have been carried out and all the
- results point to one conclusion: Television violence causes children to
- be violent and the effects can be life-long.
- The information can╒t be ignored. Violent television viewing
- does affect children. The effects have been seen in a number of cases.
- In New York, a 16-year-old boy broke into a cellar. When the police
- caught him and asked him why he was wearing gloves he replied that he
- had learned to do so to not leave fingerprints and that he discovered
- this on television. In Alabama, a nine-year-old boy received a bad
- report card from his teacher. He suggested sending the teacher poisoned
- candy as revenge as he had seen on television the night before. In
- California, a seven-year-old boy sprinkled ground-up glass into the the
- lamb stew the family was to eat for dinner. When asked why he did it he
- replied that he wanted to see if the results would be the same in real
- life as they were on television (Howe 72). These are certainly
- startling examples of how television can affect the child. It must be
- pointed out that all of these situations were directly caused by
- children watching violent television.
- Not only does television violence affect the child╒s youth, but
- it can also affect his or her adulthood. Some psychologists and
- psychiatrists feel that continued exposure to such violence might
- unnaturally speed up the impact of the adult world on the child. This
- can force the child into a kind of premature maturity. As the child
- matures into an adult, he can become bewildered, have a greater distrust
- towards others, a superficial approach to adult problems, and even an
- unwillingness to become an adult (Carter 14).
- Television violence can destroy a young child╒s mind. The
- effects of this violence can be long-lasting, if not never-ending.
- For some, television at its worst, is an assault on a
- child╒s mind, an insidious influence tat upsets moral
- balance and makes a child prone to aggressive behavior
- as it warps his or her perception of the real world.
- Other see television as an unhealthy intrusion into a
- child╒s learning process, substituting easy pictures for
- the discipline of reading and concentrating and
- transforming the young viewer into a hypnotized
- nonthinker (Langone 48).
- As you can see, television violence can disrupt a child╒s learning and
- thinking ability which will cause life long problems. If a child cannot
- do well in school, his or her whole future is at stake.
- Why do children like the violence that they see on television?
- ╥Since media violence is much more vicious than that which children
- normally experience, real-life aggression appears bland by comparison╙
- (Dorr 127). The violence on television is able to be more exciting and
- enthralling than the violence that is normally viewed on the streets.
- Instead of just seeing a police officer handing a ticket to a speeding
- violator, he can beat the offender bloody on television. However,
- children don╒t always realize this is not the way thing are handled in
- real life. They come to expect it, and when they don╒t see it the world
- becomes bland and in need of violence. The children then can create the
- violence that their mind craves.
- The television violence can cause actual violence in a number of
- ways. As explained above, after viewing television violence the world
- becomes bland in comparison. The child needs to create violence to keep
- himself satisfied (Dorr 127). Also the children find the violent
- characters on television fun to imitate. ╥Children do imitate the
- behavior of models such as those portrayed in television, movies, etc.
- They do so because the ideas that are shown to them on television are
- more attractive to the viewer than those the viewer can think up
- himself╙ (Brown 98). This has been widely seen lately with the advent
- of the Mighty Morphin╒ Power Rangers. Young children cannot seem to get
- enough of these fictional characters and will portray them often.
- Another reason why television violence causes violence in
- children is apparent in the big cities. ╥Aggressive behavior was more
- acceptable in the city, where a child╒s popularity rating with
- classmates was not hampered by his or her aggression╙ (Huesmann 166).
- In the bigger cities, crime and violence is inevitable, expected and,
- therefore, is left unchecked and out of line.
- Much research into the topic of children and television violence
- has been conducted. All of the results seem to point in the same
- direction. There are undeniable correlations between violent television
- and aggression. This result was obtained in a survey of London
- schoolchildren in 1975. Greensberg found a significant relationship
- between violence viewing and aggression (Dorr 160),
- In Israel 74 children from farms were tested as well as 112
- schoolchildren from the city of Tel Aviv. The researchers found that
- the city children watched far more television than their farmland
- counterparts. However, both groups of children were just as likely to
- choose a violent program to watch when watching television. The city
- children had a greater tendency to regard violent television programs as
- accurate reflections of real life than the farm children. Likewise, the
- city boys identified most with characters from violent programs than did
- those living on the farms (Huesmann 166).
- The government also did research in this area. They conducted
- an experiment where children were left alone in a room with a monitor
- playing a videotape of other children at play. Soon, things got ╥out of
- hand╙ and progressive mayhem began to take place. Children who had just
- seen commercial violence accepted much higher levels of aggression than
- other children. The results were published in a report. ╥A Sergon
- General╒s report found some ╘preliminary indications of a casual
- relationship between television viewing and aggressive behavior in
- children╒╙ (Langone 50).
- In other research among U.S. children it was discovered that
- aggression, academic problems, unpopularity with peers and violence feed
- off each other. This promotes violent behavior in the children
- (Huesmann 166). The child watches violence which causes aggression.
- The combination of aggression and continued television viewing lead to
- poor academic standings as well as unpopularity. These can cause more
- aggression and a vicious cycle begins to spin.
- In yet another piece if research children who watch a lot of
- violent television were compared to children who don╒t. The results
- were that the children who watched more violent television were more
- likely to agree that ╥it╒s okay to hit someone if you╒re mad at them for
- a good reason.╙ The other group learned that problems can be solved
- passively, through discussion and authority (Cheyney 46).
- The most important aspect of violence in television is
- preventing it. There are many ways in which it can be prevented, but
- not often are many carried out. These solutions are easy to implement,
- but are often overlooked because of commercial purposes.
- One such solution is to ╥create conflict without killing.╙
- Michael Landon, who starred in and directed ╥Little House on the
- Prairie╙ managed to do so in his programs. His goal was to put moral
- lessons in his show in an attempt to teach while entertaining. On the
- program ╥Hill Street Blues╙ the conflicts are usually personal and
- political matters among the characters. Although some violence does
- occur, the theme is not the action, but rather its consequences (Cheyney
- 49).
- Perhaps the most important way to prevent children from watching
- television violence is to stop it where it starts. The parents should
- step in and turn the set off when a violent program comes on. The
- parents are the child╒s role models from which he learns. If he can
- learn at an early age that violence on television is bad, then he can
- turn the set off for himself when he is older. Education should start
- at home.
- Fixing the problems of children and television violence isn╒t
- easy. There are many factors that have to be considered and people to
- be convinced. This problem will, no doubt, never go away and continue
- to get worse as the years go by. However, there are measures that can
- be taken to prevent the children from ever being exposed to such things.
- After all, what╒s the world going to be like when the people who are now
- children are running the world?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Works Cited
- Langone, John. Violence. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1984.
- Cheyney, Glenn Alan. Television in American Society. New York:
- Franklin Watts Co., 1983.
- Howe, Michael J. A. Television and Children. London: New
- University Education, 1977.
- Husemann, L. Rowell. ╥Social Channels Tune T.V.╒s effects.╙
- Science News 14 Sept. 1985: 166.
- Door, Palmer. Children and the Faces of Television. New York:
- Academic Press, 1980.
- Carter, Douglass. T.V. Violence and the Child. New York: Russel
- Sage Foundation, 1977.